I recently took my kids to Hersey’s Park in Pennsylvania. In case you haven’t heard about it, it’s just a normal attraction park with rides, and long lines. As we were waiting in line, my son asked, “Dad, what are you doing at work?”
I said, “I help my clients to define KPIs, and then try to apply Naive Bayes to predict the outcome. If the result is not good, we may need to build a neural network, and test it again.”
Do you really think that’s the answer I gave my son?
OF COURSE NOT!
Not because what I said is wrong, but he is simply not the right audience for that type of response. More importantly, I don’t want him to think “My dad is crazy and I’d better not ask him anything again.” So, I need to come up with an answer in a language that he can understand.
“If a computer can do work but no one knows whether it’s you doing the work or the computer, that’s AI.” – a basic principle of AI proposed by Alan Turing.
“Great! I can then use AI to do my homework and my teacher would not know that it’s not me doing that!”
Supervised Learning
“Hmm… Do you remember how you taught your younger sister the difference between a pen and an apple? You hold up a pen in front of her so she can see it and say, ‘pen.’ And you hold up an apple so she can see it and say, ‘apple.’ And you repeat this. Sooner or later, you expect her to understand the long pointy thing is a pen. And the red, round thing is an apple.”
Long, pointed, round, red. These are Features in Machine Learning. And “Pen” or “Apple” are Labels. Combined, this is Supervised Learning. This is one way how a computer can understand that different Features are associated with different Labels in Supervised Learning.
“Dad, I remember I saw a guy teaching people this on YouTube, too!”
Well, the song is funny but it is not related to Supervised Learning. But if it inputs the concept of Supervised Learning for a child, why not let it be?
In the real world, Supervised Learning can help in many different ways. One of them is distinguishing between a cancer cell from a normal cell. In this case, the computer is the “child” and the doctor is the “parent.” By showing examples repeatedly, the doctor trains the computer to distinguish the patterns between a normal cell and a cancer cell.
Unsupervised Learning
You may have heard about the Law of Entropy, or the Second Law of Thermodynamics. In general, unless you put in energy to keep the situation in that current state, the whole condition will just become messier over time.
You can apply the very same law to a kid’s playground. Unless you really put in effort to keep toys tidy, the toys will not automatically go back to their original positions. At my home, my mother-in-law helps out the kids to keep the play areas organized. Once, when she went to Hong Kong for a vacation, the play areas became more disorganized day after day. Finally, my wife had to step in and demand that the kids clean up before grandmother returned. She did not give exact instructions. She just demanded they clean up!
Guess what happened in the next few hours? The kids put all the four-wheels-boxy-shaped things in one area, and we called it “Cars.” And all the fluffy stuff was put together in another area, and we called it “Stuffed Animals.” And then they put all the blocks that can be stacked up together in some boxes and named “Legos.”
They did not get any specific instructions or rules to decide what should go where. But somehow they figured out the similarities and differences. In Machine Learning, this is called Unsupervised Learning.
This is when the computer is given a lot of data points and the computer figures out the pattern by itself. In the real world, Unsupervised Learning can be used in customer segmentation. There is a lot of information and data about a lot of customers. You don’t tell the computer who should be grouped with whom, but this is figured out by Unsupervised Learning. Traditionally, this is done by the expert who observes different patterns, like age, spending pattern, where you live, salary… and then tries to group the types of customers together. And now, we have the machine to play the role of expert, which is able to scan through millions of records in a few seconds but is impossible for any human being
Reinforcement Learning
When dealing with kids, it’s not always the best way to just keep telling them and keep showing them the proper examples. At the same time, it’s not very effective to give no instructions and let them figure out everything by themselves.
It’s a common practice in teaching kids to reward them when they do something good. And when they do something bad, you punish them. This is intended to reinforce certain behaviors. In Machine Learning, this is known as Reinforcement Learning.
When a computer performs the way that you want, you add a point. When it fails to do what you want, you reduce a point. The computer therefore knows what to do to gain points.
In the real world, Reinforcement Learning is applied heavily in Robotics. For example, a robot is trying to walk a straight line. It may make it or it may fall down. Whenever the robot falls down, you reduce a point. And whenever the robot successfully makes one step, you add one point. There are many motors and sensors on a robot, and all of them are collecting data for the system. The robot learns what kind of motor speed, what kind of angle is needed in order to keep walking in a straight line and avoid falling.
2 Types of Measurement
2 Popular Questions by Kids – Key Approaches in Machine Learning
Kids like to ask a strangers, “How old are you?” and “Are you a boy or a girl?”
“How old are you?” is asking for a number. It’s Regression.
“Are you a boy or a girl?” is Classification. Looking for an outcome for a pre-defined category. Both are 2 important concepts in Machine Learning.
3 Ways to Learn
Kids observe the world around them. They come up with certain rules. They will propose the result, and they will be corrected by adults. Which makes the rule to get better and better.
Compared to the old way of programming: Developer observes the world. They code rules using rule-based algorithms. And they will come up with some results. Based on this, they will change or modify the rules.
In AI, it’s a little bit different. Developer creates the AI algorithm and have it create the rule. The algorithm comes up with a model and continue to train it. The model then tries to predict the result and see if it is accurate or not. The key here is that the algorithm keeps modifying the model using more data without the developer being involved.
That’s the beauty of AI!
No Right or Wrong. Just Right or Left!
Final question: What are the similarities and differences between Tesla and Uber? They both are both in the automobile industry. But one company, Tesla, creates new technology to help revolutionize the whole car industry. While Uber uses existing technology (like mapping, mobile app..etc) to create a new business model.
So the power of AI is not just in making algorithms. It can be using existing algorithms to build new ways of doing business. One builds the technology, one utilizes it.
Remember my son who was thinking about ways to get his homework done? Ultimately, I would be equally proud if he came up with an algorithm that could do his homework and successfully fool his teacher or if he utilized existing algorithms to do the same thing. Both are important new ways of adopting AI to solve problems.
There is no Right or Wrong, only Right or Left. But no matter which direction you pick, be persistent and you will cross the finish line of success via either route – Cupid Chan tweet on Nov 28, 2018
The content of this blog has been presented in a few national and international conferences such as Open Source Summit in Shanghai China and MicroStrategy Federal Summit in Washington DC. I also captured this in my very first YouTube channel video which you can find here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dh9xz4SBukE&t=13s
Eager to integrate your own metadata repository into the Egeria ecosystem, but not sure where to start? This article walks through how to do just that: implementing an open metadata repository connector according to the standards of ODPi Egeria.
Integrating a metadata repository into the Open Metadata ecosystem involves coding an Open Metadata Collection Store Connector. These are Open Connector Framework (OCF) connectors that define how to connect to and interact with a metadata repository.
Open Metadata Collection Store Connectors are typically comprised of two parts:
The repository connector: which provides a standard repository interface that communicates using the Open Metadata Repository Services (OMRS) API and payloads.
The event mapper connector: which captures events when metadata has changed in the metadata repository and passes these along to the Open Metadata Repository Services (OMRS) cohort.
The event mapper connector often calls the repository connector: to translate the repository-native events into Egeria’s OMRS events.
While various patterns can be used to implement these, perhaps the simplest and most loosely-coupled is the adapter. The adapter approach wraps the proprietary interface(s) of the metadata repository to translate these into OMRS calls and payloads. In this way, the metadata repository can communicate as if it were an open metadata repository.
The remainder of this article will walkthrough:
implementing such an adapter pattern as a connector, and
using the resulting connector through the proxy capabilities provided by the core of Egeria.
1. Design work
Designing before implementing
Before delving straight into the implementation of a connector, you really need to start with a level of design work. Fundamentally this will involve two steps:
The best place to start with the design work is to understand the meta-model of Egeria itself. Consider how your metadata repository will map to the fundamental Egeria metadata concepts: Entities, Classifications, and Relationships.
When implementing the code described in the remainder of this article, you’ll be making use of and mapping to these fundamental Egeria concepts. Therefore, it is well worth your time now understanding them in some detail. This is before even considering specific instances of these types like GlossaryTerm or GlossaryCategory.
Meta-model mapping may be quite a straightforward conceptual mapping for some repositories. For example, Apache Atlas has the same concepts of Entities, Classifications and Relationships all as first-class objects.
On the other hand, not all repositories do. For example, IBM Information Governance Catalog (IGC) has Entities, and a level of Relationships and Classifications — but the latter two are not really first-class objects (i.e. properties and values cannot exist on them).
Therefore you may need to consider
whether to attempt to support these constructs in your mappings, and
if so, how to prescriptively represent them (if they are not first-class objects).
For example, in the implementation of the sample IGC connector we suggest using categories with specific names in IGC to represent certain classifications. Additionally, one of the reasons for implementing a read-only connector is that we can still handle relationships without any properties: by simply having the properties of any Egeria relationships we translate from IGC all be empty.
Map to the Egeria open metadata types
Once you have some idea for how to handle the mapping to the meta-model concepts, check your thinking by working through a few examples. Pick a few of the open metadata types and work out on paper how they map to your metadata repository’s pre-existing model. Common areas to do this would be e.g. GlossaryTerm, GlossaryCategory for glossary (business vocabulary) content; RelationalColumn, etc for relational database structures; and so on.
Most of these should be fairly straightforward after you have an approach for mapping to the fundamental meta-model concepts.
Then you’ll also want to decide how to handle any differences in types between the open metadata types and your repository’s pre-existing types:
Can your metadata repository be extended with new types?
Can your metadata repository’s pre-existing types be extended with new properties?
What impacts might be caused to repositories (and metadata instances) that already exist if you add to or extend the types?
What impacts will this have on your UI or how users interact with these extensions?
Your answers to these questions will inevitably depend on your specific metadata repository, but should help you decide on what approach you’d like to take:
Ignore any open metadata types that do not map to your pre-existing types.
Add any Egeria open metadata types that do not exist in your repository.
Add Egeria open metadata properties to your pre-existing types when Egeria has additional properties that do not yet exist in your type(s).
Implement a read-only connection (possibly with some hard-coding of property values) for types that are partially map-able, but not easily extended to support the full set of properties defined on the open metadata type.
and so on.
2. Pre-requisites
Creating your own connector project
Implementing an adapter can be greatly accelerated by using the pre-built base classes of Egeria. Therefore building a connector using Java is likely the easiest way to start.
This requires an appropriate build environment comprised of both Java (minimally v1.8) and Maven.
Setup a project
Egeria has been designed to allow connectors to be developed in projects independently from the core itself. Some examples have already been implemented, which could provide a useful reference point as you proceed through this walkthrough:
Naturally change the version to whichever version of Egeria you’d like to build against. The dependencies listed ensure you’ll have the necessary portion of Egeria to build your connector against.
3. Implement the repository connector
Implementing your connector in your own project
The repository connector exposes the ability to search, query, create, update and delete metadata in an existing metadata repository. As such, it will be the core of your adapter.
You can start to build this within your new project by creating a new Maven module called something like adapter. Within this adapter module implement the following:
Implement an OMRSRepositoryConnectorProvider
Start by writing an OMRSRepositoryConnectorProvider specific to your connector, which extends OMRSRepositoryConnectorProviderBase. The connector provider is a factory for its corresponding connector. Much of the logic needed is coded in the base class, and therefore your implementation really only involves defining the connector class and setting this in the constructor.
package org.odpi.egeria.connectors.apache.atlas.repositoryconnector;
import org.odpi.openmetadata.frameworks.connectors.properties.beans.ConnectorType;
import org.odpi.openmetadata.repositoryservices.connectors.stores.metadatacollectionstore.repositoryconnector.OMRSRepositoryConnectorProviderBase;
public class ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryConnectorProvider extends OMRSRepositoryConnectorProviderBase {
static final String connectorTypeGUID = "7b200ca2-655b-4106-917b-abddf2ec3aa4";
static final String connectorTypeName = "OMRS Apache Atlas Repository Connector";
static final String connectorTypeDescription = "OMRS Apache Atlas Repository Connector that processes events from the Apache Atlas repository store.";
public ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryConnectorProvider() {
Class connectorClass = ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryConnector.class;
super.setConnectorClassName(connectorClass.getName());
ConnectorType connectorType = new ConnectorType();
connectorType.setType(ConnectorType.getConnectorTypeType());
connectorType.setGUID(connectorTypeGUID);
connectorType.setQualifiedName(connectorTypeName);
connectorType.setDisplayName(connectorTypeName);
connectorType.setDescription(connectorTypeDescription);
connectorType.setConnectorProviderClassName(this.getClass().getName());
super.connectorTypeBean = connectorType;
}
}
Note that you’ll need to define a unique GUID for the connector type, and a meaningful name and description. Really all you then need to implement is the constructor, which can largely be a copy / paste for most adapters. Just remember to change the connectorClass to your own, which you’ll implement in the next step (below).
Implement an OMRSRepositoryConnector
Next, write an OMRSRepositoryConnector specific to your connector, which extends OMRSRepositoryConnector. This defines the logic to connect to and disconnect from your metadata repository. As such the main logic of this class will be implemented by:
Overriding the initialize() method to define any logic for initializing the connection: for example, connecting to an underlying database, starting a REST API session, etc.
Overriding the setMetadataCollectionId() method to create an OMRSMetadataCollection for your repository (see next step below).
Overriding the disconnect() method to properly cleanup / close such resources.
Whenever possible, it makes sense to try to re-use any existing client library that might exist for your repository. For example, Apache Atlas provides a client through Maven that we can use directly. Re-using it saves us from needing to implement and maintain various beans for the (de)serialization of REST API calls.
package org.odpi.egeria.connectors.apache.atlas.repositoryconnector;
import org.apache.atlas.AtlasClientV2;
public class ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryConnector extends OMRSRepositoryConnector {
private String url;
private AtlasClientV2 atlasClient;
private boolean successfulInit = false;
public ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryConnector() { }
@Override
public void initialize(String connectorInstanceId,
ConnectionProperties connectionProperties) {
super.initialize(connectorInstanceId, connectionProperties);
final String methodName = "initialize";
// Retrieve connection details
Map<String, Object> proxyProperties = this.connectionBean.getConfigurationProperties();
this.url = (String) proxyProperties.get("apache.atlas.rest.url");
String username = (String) proxyProperties.get("apache.atlas.username");
String password = (String) proxyProperties.get("apache.atlas.password");
this.atlasClient = new AtlasClientV2(new String[]{ this.url }, new String[]{ username, password });
// Test REST API connection by attempting to retrieve types list
try {
AtlasTypesDef atlasTypes = atlasClient.getAllTypeDefs(new SearchFilter());
successfulInit = (atlasTypes != null && atlasTypes.hasEntityDef("Referenceable"));
} catch (AtlasServiceException e) {
log.error("Unable to retrieve types from Apache Atlas.", e);
}
if (!successfulInit) {
ApacheAtlasOMRSErrorCode errorCode = ApacheAtlasOMRSErrorCode.REST_CLIENT_FAILURE;
String errorMessage = errorCode.getErrorMessageId() + errorCode.getFormattedErrorMessage(this.url);
throw new OMRSRuntimeException(
errorCode.getHTTPErrorCode(),
this.getClass().getName(),
methodName,
errorMessage,
errorCode.getSystemAction(),
errorCode.getUserAction()
);
}
}
@Override
public void setMetadataCollectionId(String metadataCollectionId) {
this.metadataCollectionId = metadataCollectionId;
if (successfulInit) {
metadataCollection = new ApacheAtlasOMRSMetadataCollection(this,
serverName,
repositoryHelper,
repositoryValidator,
metadataCollectionId);
}
}
}
This has been abbreviated from the actual class for simplicity; however, note that as part of the initialize() it may make sense to test out the parameters received for configuring the connection, to make sure that a connection to your repository can actually be established before proceeding any further.
(This is also used in this example to setup a flag successfulInit to indicate whether connectivity was possible, so that if it was not we do not proceed any further with setting up the metadata collection and we allow the connector to fail immediately, with a meaningful error.)
You may want to wrap the metadata repository client’s methods with your own methods in this class as well. Generally think of this class as “speaking the language” of your proprietary metadata repository, while the next class “speaks” Egeria.
Implement an OMRSMetadataCollection
Finally, write an OMRSMetadataCollection specific to your repository, which extends OMRSMetadataCollectionBase. This can grow to be quite a large class, with many methods, but is essential for the participation of your metadata repository in a broader cohort. In particular, it is heavily leveraged by Egeria’s Enterprise Connector to federate actions against your metadata repository. As such, this is how your connector “speaks” Egeria (open metadata).
Ideally your implementation should override each of the methods defined in the base class. To get started:
Override the addTypeDef() method. For each TypeDef this method should either extend your metadata repository to include this TypeDef, configure the mapping from your repository’s types to the open metadata types, or throw a TypeDefNotSupportedException. (For those that are implemented it may be helpful to store these in a class member for comparison in the next step.)
Override the verifyTypeDef() method, which can check the types you have implemented (above) conform to the open metadata TypeDef received (ie. that all properties are available, of the same data type, etc), and that if none have yet been listed as implemented that false is returned (this will cause addTypeDef() above to automatically be called).
Override the getEntityDetail() method that retrieves an entity by its GUID.
Note that there are various options for implementing each of these. Which route to take will depend on the particulars of your specific metadata repository:
In the sample IBM InfoSphere Information Governance Catalog Repository Connector the mappings are defined in code. This approach was used because IGC does not have first-class Relationship or Classification objects. Therefore, some complex logic is needed in places to achieve an appropriate mapping. Furthermore, if a user wants to extend the logic or mappings used for their particular implementation of IGC, this approach allows complete flexibility to do so. (A developer simply needs to override the appropriate method(s) with custom logic.)
The sample Apache Atlas Repository Connector illustrates a different approach. Because the TypeDefs are quite similar to those of Egeria, it is easier to map more directly through configuration files. A generic set of classes can be implemented that use these configuration files to drive the specifics of each mapping. In this case, simple JSON files were used to define the omrs name of a particular object or property and the corresponding atlas entity / property name to which it should be mapped. While this allows for much more quickly adding new mappings for new object types, it is far less flexible than the code-based approach used for IGC. (It is only capable of handling very simple mappings: anything complex would either require the definition of a complicated configuration file or still resorting to code).
Once these minimal starting points are implemented, you should be able to configure the OMAG Server Platform as a proxy to your repository connector by following the instructions in the next step.
Important: this will not necessarily be the end-state pattern you intend to use for your repository connector. Nonetheless, it can provide a quick way to start testing its functionality.
This very basic, initial scaffold of an implementation allows:
a connection to be instantiated to your repository, and
translation between your repository’s representation of metadata and the open metadata standard types.
4. Package your connector
Packaging your connector
To make your connector available to run within the OMAG Server Platform, you can package it into a distributable .jar file using another Maven module, something like distribution.
In this module’s POM file include your adapter module (by artifactId) as a dependency, and consider using the maven-shade-plugin to define just the necessary components for your .jar file. Since it should only ever be executed as part of an Egeria OMAG Server Platform, your .jar file does not need to re-include all of the underlying Egeria dependencies.
For example, in our Apache Atlas Repository Connector we only need to include the adapter module itself and the base dependencies for Apache Atlas’s Java client (all other dependencies like Egeria core itself, the Spring framework, etc will already be available through the Egeria OMAG Server Platform):
Of course, you do not need to use the maven-shade-plugin to accomplish such bundling: feel free to define a Maven assembly or other Maven techniques.
Building and packaging your connector should then be as simple as running the following from the root of your project tree:
$ mvn clean install
Working out exactly which dependencies to include when you are using an external client like Apache Atlas’s can be a little bit tricky. Starting small will inevitably result in various errors related to classes not being found: when building you’ll see a list of all the classes considered by the shade plugin and which are included and excluded. You can use this to make some educated guesses as to which may still need to be included if you are running into errors about classes not being found. (Ideally you’ll have a simple, single jar file / dependency you can directly include instead of needing to work through this, but that won’t always be the case.)
Again, since we will just be using this connector alongside the existing OMAG Server Platform, this avoids ending up with a .jar file that includes the entirety of the Egeria OMAG Server Platform (and its dependencies) in your connector .jar — and instead allows your minimal .jar to be loaded at startup of the core OMAG Server Platform and configured through the REST calls covered in section 6.
Of course, if you intend to embed or otherwise implement your own server, the packaging mechanism will likely be different. However, as mentioned in the previous step this should provide a quick and easy initial way of testing the functionality of the connector against the core of Egeria.
5. Startup the OMAG Server Platform with your connector
Configuring the OMAG Server Platform with your connector
Assuming you’ve built your connector .jar file using the approach outlined above, you’ll now have a .jar file under the distribution/target/ directory of your project: for the Apache Atlas example, this would be distribution/target/egeria-connector-apache-atlas-package-1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar.
When starting up the OMAG Server Platform of Egeria, we need to point to this .jar file using either the LOADER_PATH environment variable or a -Dloader.path= command-line argument to the server start command:
Either startup should ensure your connector is now available to the OMAG Server Platform to use for connecting to your metadata repository. You may also want to setup the LOGGING_LEVEL_ROOT environment variable to define a more granular logging level for your initial testing, e.g. export LOGGING_LEVEL_ROOT=INFO before running the startup command above, to receive deeper information on the startup. (You can also setup a similar variable to get even deeper information for just your portion of code by using your unique package name, e.g. export LOGGING_LEVEL_ORG_ODPI_EGERIA_CONNECTOR_X_Y_Z=DEBUG.)
Then configure the OMAG Server Platform to use your connector. Note that the configuration and startup sequence is important.
Start with just the following:
Enable the OMAG Server as a repository proxy
Enable the OMAG Server as a repository proxy by specifying your canonical OMRSRepositoryConnectorProvider class name for the connectorProvider={javaClassName} parameter and POSTing to:
During server startup you should then see various messages related to the metadata type registration process as the open metadata types are checked against your repository. (These in turn call the methods you’ve implemented in your OMRSMetadataCollection.) You might naturally need to iron out a few bugs in those methods before proceeding further…
6. Test your connector’s basic operations
Testing your connector’s basic operations via API
Each time you change your connector code, you’ll naturally want to re-build it (mvn clean install) and restart the OMAG Server Platform. If you are not changing any of the configuration, you can simply restart the OMAG Server Platform and re-run the POST to start the server instance (the last step above). If you need to change something in the configuration itself, it will be best to:
Stop the OMAG Server Platform.
Delete the configuration document (a file named something like omag.server.test.config).
Start the OMAG Server Platform again.
Re-run both steps above (enabling the OMAG Server as a proxy, and starting the instance).
From there you can continue to override other methods of the OMRSMetadataCollectionBase class to implement the other metadata functionality for searching, updating and deleting as well as retrieving other instances of metadata like relationships. Most of these methods can be directly invoked (and therefore tested) using the REST API endpoints of the OMAG server.
These are likely to require the most significant logic for any mappings / translations you’re doing between the open metadata types and your own repository. For example, with Apache Atlas these are where we translate between the Apache Atlas native types like AtlasGlossaryTerm and its representation in the Apache Atlas java client and the open metadata type GlossaryTerm and its representation through the standard OMRS interfaces.
The other main area to then implement is searching, for example:
… with a payload like the following (to find only those GlossaryTerms classified as ContextDefinitions where the scope of the context definition contains local — note to change the classification type you change the end of the URL path, above):
You hopefully have access to a search API for your repository so that you can efficiently fulfil these requests. You want to avoid pulling back a large portion of your metadata and having to loop through it in memory to find specific objects. Instead, push-down the search to your repository itself as much as possible…
Once you have those working, it should be relatively easy to go back and fill in areas like the other TypeDef-related methods, to ensure your connector can participate appropriately in a broader open metadata cohort.
Write operations
While the ordering above is necessary for all connectors, if you’ve decided to also implement write operations for your repository there are further methods to override. These include:
creation operations like addEntity,
update operations like updateEntityProperties,
and reference copy-related operations like saveEntityReferenceCopy.
If you are only implementing a read-only connector, these methods can be left as-is and the base class will indicate they are not supported by your connector.
7. Add the event mapper connector
Adding the event mapper
The event mapper connector enables events from an existing metadata repository to distribute changes to metadata to the rest of the metadata repositories who are members of the same OMRS cohort. It is not a mandatory component: as long as your connector can “speak” Egeria through an OMRSMetadataCollection it can participate in an open metadata cohort via the Enterprise Connector. However, if your metadata repository already has some kind of event or notification mechanism, the event mapper can be an efficient addition to participating in the broader open metadata cohort.
Within the same adapter Maven module, perhaps under a new sub-package like ...eventmapper, implement the following:
Implement an OMRSRepositoryEventMapperProvider
Start by writing an OMRSRepositoryEventMapperProvider specific to your connector, which extends OMRSRepositoryConnectorProviderBase. The connector provider is a factory for its corresponding connector. Much of the logic needed is coded in the base class, and therefore your implementation really only involves defining the connector class and setting this in the constructor.
package org.odpi.egeria.connectors.apache.atlas.eventmapper;
import org.odpi.openmetadata.frameworks.connectors.properties.beans.ConnectorType;
import org.odpi.openmetadata.repositoryservices.connectors.stores.metadatacollectionstore.repositoryconnector.OMRSRepositoryConnectorProviderBase;
public class ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryEventMapperProvider extends OMRSRepositoryConnectorProviderBase {
static final String connectorTypeGUID = "daeca2f1-9d23-46f4-a380-19a1b6943746";
static final String connectorTypeName = "OMRS Apache Atlas Event Mapper Connector";
static final String connectorTypeDescription = "OMRS Apache Atlas Event Mapper Connector that processes events from the Apache Atlas repository store.";
public ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryEventMapperProvider() {
Class connectorClass = ApacheAtlasOMRSRepositoryEventMapper.class;
super.setConnectorClassName(connectorClass.getName());
ConnectorType connectorType = new ConnectorType();
connectorType.setType(ConnectorType.getConnectorTypeType());
connectorType.setGUID(connectorTypeGUID);
connectorType.setQualifiedName(connectorTypeName);
connectorType.setDisplayName(connectorTypeName);
connectorType.setDescription(connectorTypeDescription);
connectorType.setConnectorProviderClassName(this.getClass().getName());
super.setConnectorTypeProperties(connectorType);
}
}
Note that you’ll need to define a unique GUID for the connector type, and a meaningful name and description. Really all you then need to implement is the constructor, which can largely be a copy / paste for most adapters. Just remember to change the connectorClass to your own, which you’ll implement in the next step (below).
Implement an OMRSRepositoryEventMapper
Next, write an OMRSRepositoryEventMapper specific to your connector, which extends OMRSRepositoryEventMapperBase and implements VirtualConnectorExtension and OpenMetadataTopicListener. This defines the logic to pickup and process events or notifications from your repository and produce corresponding OMRS events. As such the main logic of this class will be implemented by:
Overriding the initialize() method to define how you will initialize your event mapper. For example, this could be connecting to an existing event bus for your repository, or some other mechanism through which events should be sourced.
Overriding the start() method to define how to startup the processing of such events.
Implement the initializeEmbeddedConnectors() method to register as a listener to any OpenMetadataTopicConnectors that are passed as embedded connectors.
Implement the processEvent() method to define how to process each event received from your repository’s event / notification mechanism.
The bulk of the logic in the event mapper should be called from this processEvent() method: defining how events that are received from your repository are processed (translated) into OMRS events that deal with Entities, Classifications and Relationships.
Typically you would want to construct such instances by calling into your OMRSMetadataCollection, ensuring you produce the same payloads of information for these instances both through API connectivity and the events.
Once you have the appropriate OMRS object, you can make use of the methods provided by the repositoryEventProcessor, configured by the base class, to publish these to the cohort. For example:
repositoryEventProcessor.processNewEntityEvent(...) to publish a new entity instance (EntityDetail)
repositoryEventProcessor.processUpdatedRelationshipEvent(...) to publish an updated relationship instance (Relationship)
and so on
To add the event mapper configuration to the OMAG Server Platform configuration you started with above, add:
Configure the cohort event bus
This should be done first, before any of the other configuration steps above, by POSTing to:
This can be done nearly last, after all of the other configuration steps above but still before the start of the server instance. Specify your canonical OMRSRepositoryEventMapperProvider class name for the connectorProvider={javaClassName} parameter and connection details to your repository’s event source in the eventSource parameter by POSTing to:
Components for testing your connector’s conformance
Aside from the API-based testing you might do as part of the on-going implementation of your OMRSMetadataCollection class, once you are in a position where you have most of the methods implemented it is a good idea to test your connector against the Egeria Conformance Suite.
This will provide guidance on what features you may still need to implement in order to conform to the open metadata standards.
The success that ODPi has achieved as a nonprofit organization committed to simplification and standardization of the big data ecosystem is driven by the dedication of our member organizations and individuals. The ODPi Member Spotlight series interviews key ODPi contributors for a conversation exploring why they participate in ODPi, seeking to learn more about the individuals whose efforts are accelerating the development of today’s Big Data ecosystem, standards and solutions.
We recently spoke with Ferd Scheepers, Chief Information Architect for ING, to discuss his involvement with ODPi. In his role as ING’s global Chief Information Architect, Ferd has driven ING’s journey to becoming a data driven company for the last 5 years, defining ING’s Data Lake architecture for information management. He is championing the Apache Atlas and ODPi open metadata initiatives, and took time to share his vision, ideas and what motivates his contributions to ODPi–along with insight on how ING benefits from being an active member.
Tell me about your job position and what you are responsible for at ING?
For the last five years, I have been working as the global Chief Information Architect of ING. In this role, I am responsible for creating the Information Architecture for ING, which is becoming more and more important as we pursue the ambition of becoming a true data-driven organisation. We have created the ING data lake architecture, which is the main vehicle for ING to implement a fully metadata-driven data landscape, where all the data in the organisation is known. By known we mean not only where the data is, but also the data quality, the meaning, the owner of the data, and the full lineage from where the data comes to life, to any place the data is consumed, either by ING employees or by external parties like our regulators.
What is your involvement with ODPi? Tell us about the role you’ve played, your contributions, goals, and interests.
We got involved with ODPi in early 2017. At that time we had started together with IBM and Hortonworks to drive an Open Metadata initiative to define a set of open metadata standards, and build both a reference implementation for an Open Metadata compliant Metadata repository and the Open Metadata Highway. The Open Metadata Highway is a set of (Open Metadata Repository) Services that let different metadata repositories talk to each other in order to exchange metadata. On top of OMRS there is a set of (Open Metadata Access) Services, that enable dedicated applications or UIs specific for different personas in the organisation to consume services from the entire metadata landscape.
ODPi as an existing vendor-neutral organisation came in the picture as the most logical home for this open standard. Apache Atlas was chosen for the reference implementation for an Open Metadata compliant metadata repository, and the Open Metadata Highway was developed as the Egeria project within ODPi.
Why does ING see value in this work that ODPi is providing a vendor-neutral home for?
When ING got involved in driving this Open Metadata initiative, we knew that making such an initiative succeed requires several things. A willingness of several vendors to join together to make it a success. At least one company (preferably more) that represents the consumers of these vendor solutions, to explain the need for such a standard from a consumer perspective. And an open, vendor-neutral and respected community to be a home for the standard.
IBM and Hortonworks were involved from day one representing the vendors. ING took on the role to be the catalyst to bring them together. Not just as a voice of the customer, we decided to sit in the driving seat and have a full team contribute to developing this open standard. ODPi already being a very active group in steering the standardisation around Hadoop distributions seemed the logical choice for a home for the work that we were doing. Both because ODPi already had most of the facilities we needed, and because many of the vendors we wanted to join in this initiative were already a member.
ING also became a full member of ODPi in 2017 to support the valuable work ODPi is doing. We very much value the platform ODPi offers for developing the open standard, but more importantly, we value the community of vendors it brings us, and the exposure we get from ODPi to get the open standard known within a bigger community of both vendors and consumers.
What benefit has ING recognized from its membership with ODPi? What value do you expect to see from your participation?
Our participation in ODPi has already given us the platform to develop the ODPi Egeria open metadata standard. A full team from ING has been actively building the standard on the ODPi infrastructure. As a member, we also get to co-steer the direction of the open metadata initiative, and we benefit from the marketing initiatives from ODPi.
Through the community, we have now also involved SAS in the open metadata initiative, and we are talking to others. We expect ODPi to help us get this initiative known even more, both within the vendor community and with the consumer community.
Once the standard is mature, we see a role for ODPi in validating compliance to the standard, by delivering a test suite. ODPi will also deliver a set of value packs on top of the standard, like a GDPR pack, something we also see a lot of value in.
ODPi Egeria – Project Objectives
Tell us what excites you the most personally in regards to the technical work being done in ODPi?
Being a real nerd, I love to develop a new standard by really building it from scratch. Unfortunately, I can’t spend all my days coding anymore, so I am limited to reading some of the code that was developed, and to help drive the architecture and design for Egeria.
Building this standard, in my opinion, will be a game changer for the data industry, once we have a way to govern all data in all systems through the metadata, it will take the maturity of data management and governance to a whole new level. Imagine banks like ING delivering data to our regulators through a set of open formats, with the open metadata format on top. Our regulators having full lineage on where the data originated. It would solve all the challenges companies have today on proving that they are in control.
Companies exchanging data will be able to see where their data is being used, and supply usage agreements with that data in an open format. Data being available everywhere with the full metadata, every data consumer understanding what data they look at, the quality, the definitions, in any technology they use. Imagine customers being able to see exactly where their data is, who has access to it, what consent they have given.
Data privacy by design will truly become feasible through such a standard. And we will not stop at the traditional data landscape, it also extends to APIs, events, all the ways data is made accessible. I believe this standard is the beginning of a transformation in data management, and I think it is a very exciting project to work on.
SAN FRANCISCO, February 11, 2019 – ODPi, a nonprofit Linux Foundation project, accelerating the open ecosystem of big data solutions, today announced the ODPi Egeria Conformance Program, which ensures vendors who ship ODPi Egeria in their product offerings are delivering a consistent set of APIs and capabilities, such that data governance professionals can easily build an enterprise-wide metadata catalog that all their data tools can easily leverage.
Egeria is one of the open source projects under the ODPi umbrella. ODPi aims to be a standard for simplifying, sharing and developing an open big data ecosystem.
“Open metadata and governance is incredibly valuable IT operating environments. The ODPi Egeria ecosystem is taking a big step today aimed at fulfilling the promise of delivering useful metadata exchange capabilities and vendors are beginning to sign up to the standards,” said John Mertic director of program management, ODPi. “By adopting ODPi Egeria standards and implementation as the core of your metadata management and governance program, an organization is able to future-proof their investments and be able to adopt the best-of-breed tools for their business.”
Open metadata and governance is a key part of the standardization of IT operating environments. If software and data components can be described in a common way, including the relationships between them, and annotated with governance requirements then it becomes much easier to automate deployments and optimize workload deployments. These are valuable outcomes for any company dealing with big data.
The ODPi Egeria Conformance program makes it possible for vendors to test their products to ensure their conformance to project standards and provides exclusive marks to use in customer facing support materials. Conformance is accomplished through a self-testing program.
The Conformance program has been designed to aid businesses who are dealing with metadata and will quickly see the benefits of adding Egeria conformance to the list of requirements for new software tool purchases. Both IBM and SAS, leading vendors of data governance tools who have contributed to ODPi Egeria since it’s inception, have committed to ship ODPi Egeria Conformant products in 2019. Many more vendors are evaluating ODPi Egeria and will announce their conformance at a later date.
ODPi Egeria, a new project from ODPi launched in August 2018, supports the free flow of metadata between different technologies and vendor offerings. Egeria enables organizations to locate, manage and use their data more effectively. In addition, it provides governance features that smooth over the gaps between different vendor offerings enabling organization to have a complete and highly automated governance program
“ODPi Egeria brings much-needed standards to the world of metadata management and governance,” said Jay Limburn, IBM Distinguished Engineer and Director of Offering Management, Unified Governance and Integration Products. “The work aligns well with our unified governance strategy and we look forward to continuing our work with ODPi to deliver products based on ODPi Egeria and the ODPI Egeria Conformance Program.” “The ODPi Egeria technology is advancing rapidly due to the support of companies such as IBM, ING and SAS. The project is less than a year old and already it is being embedded in key products,” said Mandy Chessell, lead for the ODPi Egeria project. “The launch of the conformance program is the next phase in its maturity, enabling vendors to advertise that their software can collaborate in the ODPi Egeria ecosystem. By delivering the conformance suite as open source, we are enabling organizations to verify that any technology they are considering purchasing will operate correctly in an ODPi Egeria ecosystem,”
“As a maintainer of the ODPi Egeria project, we are thrilled to see the next step in its maturity, with the ODPi Egeria Conformance program,” said Craig Rubendall, Vice President, Platform Research and Development, SAS. “This program is critical to ensure the consistency and quality of the solutions integrating with and leveraging the ODPi Egeria open metadata standards. As SAS rolls out products that have this support we can be confident it is being done in a way that ensures the interoperability goals set by ODPi Egeria.”
About ODPi ODPi is a nonprofit organization committed to simplification and standardization of the big data ecosystem. As a shared industry effort, ODPi members represent big data technology, solution provider and end user organizations focused on promoting and advancing the state of big data technologies for the enterprise. For more information about ODPi, please visit: http://www.ODPi.org
About The Linux Foundation
The Linux Foundation is the organization of choice for the world’s top developers and companies to build ecosystems that accelerate open technology development and commercial adoption. Together with the worldwide open source community, it is solving the hardest technology problems by creating the largest shared technology investment in history. Founded in 2000, The Linux Foundation today provides tools, training and events to scale any open source project, which together deliver an economic impact not achievable by any one company. More information can be found at www.linuxfoundation.org.
The Linux Foundation has registered trademarks and uses trademarks. For a list of trademarks of The Linux Foundation, please see our trademark usage page: https://www.linuxfoundation.org/trademark-usage.
SAN FRANCISCO – December 13, 2018 – ODPi, a nonprofit organization accelerating the open ecosystem of big data solutions, today announced a new white paper that showcases how ODPi members IBM, SAS, Index Analytics and other technical contributors leverage Business Intelligence (BI) and Big Data for better ROI. The annual research takes the pulse of industry leaders and displays insight into how BI can be addressed by Hadoop through multi-structured data and advanced big data analytics.
“It doesn’t matter how much data you have; unless you can get the insight from it, it is just bits and bytes occupying the storage,” said Cupid Chan, CTO at Index Analytics. “As more traditional businesses evolve to digital transformation, they need to be leveraging true BI and Big Data into their products and services to get the results they want.”
By 2020, the accumulated volume of big data will increase from 4.4 zettabytes to roughly 44 zettabytes or 44 trillion GB and companies will be charged with turning this data into insight. Big data technologies like Hadoop have become an ecosystem of open source projects that provide processing engines to perform data transformation and analysis. Many businesses, however, don’t know how to combine the BI with Big Data to get insightful business value.
ODPi’s newest white paper presents best practices for combining BI and Big Data. ODPi members IBM and SAS and current technical contributors from other BI vendors including Qlik, MicroStrategy and Tableau share real end-user perspectives on how they are using big data tools, the challenges they face and where they are looking to enhance their investments.
Their unique perspectives highlight includes:
The preferred BI/SQL Connector (Hive, Presto, Impala…etc) for their BI Tool to connect to Hadoop
Best practices to connect to both Hadoop and RDBMS
Recommended BI architecture to query data in Hadoop
How BI runs advanced analytics including Machine Learn algorithm on Hadoop
As an industry practitioner and ODPi lead for the BI & AI Special Interest Group (SIG), Chan discussed and surveyed a few project members and contributors in the technical community to benchmark findings in this annual survey. To view the complete white paper, click here.
“As data sizes continue to grow, it becomes harder and harder to gain visual and analytic insights from it,” said Craig Rubendall, Vice President, Platform Research and Development at SAS. “To be successful, it is imperative to use practices and products built to handle the demands of this environment. SAS is proud to collaborate with the other contributors to share our experience and knowledge.”
Hosted by The Linux Foundation, ODPi is an industry effort that aims to accelerate the adoption of big data technologies. Through a vendor-neutral, industry-wide approach to data governance and data science, ODPi members bring maturity and choice to an open ecosystem. In fact, ODPi welcomes Index Analytics as a new member and participant in its growing ecosystem to concentrating on advancing strategies and initiatives for data science, BI and Artificial Intelligence (AI).
About the newest member:
Index Analytics has optimized IT solutions and improved our clients’ return on investment (ROI) by providing high-quality enterprise Health IT solutions to Federal & State government agencies. We encourage a culture of data curiosity at every implementation, championed by our experienced, dedicated personnel. This culture promotes meaningful outcomes for our clients and a strong sense of partnership throughout the process.
About ODPi
ODPi is a nonprofit organization committed to simplification and standardization of the big data ecosystem. As a shared industry effort, ODPi members represent big data technology, solution provider and end user organizations focused on promoting and advancing the state of big data technologies for the enterprise. For more information about ODPi, please visit: http://www.ODPi.org
to simplification and standardization of the big data ecosystem is driven by the dedication of our member organizations and individuals. The ODPi Member Spotlight series interviews key ODPi contributors for a conversation exploring why they participate in ODPi, seeking to learn more about the individuals whose efforts are accelerating the development of today’s Big Data ecosystem, standards and solutions.
